The Field Of Business Strategy - 1092 Words

Billy The field of Business Strategy is wide and uncertain. It preaches that balance is benefit, and in order to successfully operate a company comprised of many moving parts requires a more general knowledge of everything, rather than a specialization in a few areas, and lacking general knowledge of the rest. What is best to do for business isn’t a formula, or an algorithm, or anything plain and simple. It is like chess strategy, save the few situations that involve an early end of game. It is not known if offence is better than defense, and decisions are based upon the current situation, but decisions, early ones especially, are guided heavily by instinct. There is no â€Å"right move†, or rather there are multiple, many in the business†¦show more content†¦It is no surprise, therefore, that it is becoming a dependable and beneficial resource to companies. Also, extensive tasks that are essential to business operation must be completed by a team, tasks that involve moving parts in a changing market, and therefore the ability to work in a team is a valuable asset for employees, and the ability to craft a team that will work efficiently is a valuable asset to the business strategy of managers. But does there need to be a team for everything? The author articulates that to put a team on a small or simple task actually becomes inefficient. The decision to make a team stems from wanting an efficient allocation of resources. Since some work better on their own, that makes them valuable when it comes to small or large and simple tasks, that would not benefit much from the differing opinions of a team, nor the manpower of a team. The next idea I identified was to build from the bottom. In an article that examined what successful CEOs know and do, two of the four sections are: â€Å"They Know the Whole Business† and â€Å"They Know the Industry†. A little can go a long way when it comes to business strategy. In order to develop an effective business strategy, and therefore the most important foundation of business strategy, is to build from the bottom, including building your own knowledge. Other articles I examined included a start up phone

Peer Groups and Bullying Incidents Essay - 1720 Words

On April 9th 1999, Eric Klebold and Dylan Harris entered Columbine High School and after shooting 11 people inside the school, the two boys shot themselves. March 5th 2001, Charles â€Å"Andy† Williams began shooting inside Santana High School in Santee, California killing 2 students and injuring 13 others. In another incident four students and one teacher were killed as well as 10 other people wounded outside a middle school in Arkansas while student shooters fired shots from the nearby woods during a false fire alarm. In recent news Tyler Clementi jumped off the George Washington Bridge in New York after another student secretly showed streaming video of a sexual encounter between Tyler and another boy, and Megan Meir hung herself†¦show more content†¦Students who bully can tend to be more aggressive, impulsive, and insecure despite the appearance of popularity. Students who are identified as bullies act out toward others because they may feel their behavio r is well justified (stopbullyingnow.com) Many factors beginning in the home have been positively associated as a risk factor for children engaging in bullying others. Children who bully are likely to come from home situations in which there is little warmth and little positive adult attention, discipline can be inconsistent and at times physically aggressive (Olweus 1993) Divorce seems to be a common characteristic and divorce combined with punitive parenting increases the risk factor (Olweus 1994). Often times children are encouraged to â€Å"fight back† when they are bullied which in turn can lead to a higher chance that child will bully others in the future. (Olweus 1994) Children who are bullies may demonstrate less than adequate empathy for others and may have difficulty making connections in cause and effect relationships. ( Syversten, Flanagan, Stout 2009) Many schools are currently investigating their current school culture and how it is related to the bullying incidents occurring at the school. School culture in broad terms is the student and staff perception of the schoolShow MoreRelatedToo Much Violence and Bullying among Adolescents816 Words   |  3 Pagesyears, there has been an increase in the number of youth violence and social/relational bullying incidents among adolescents. Dresler-Hawke and Whitehead (2009, p. 195) define relational bullying as â€Å"a form of victimization whereby peer relationships are purposefully undermined with the intention of socially excluding individuals.† Relational bullying relates to the adolescent as this is an indirect form of bullying that has a negative impact on the social development of this population (Vessey, DiFazioRead MoreThe Social Problem Of Peer Pressure1659 Words   |  7 Pageson will be on how peer pressure is correlated to conformity. The sociological perspective I wi ll be applying towards my research will encompass Symbolic Interaction Sociological Perspective. I will be addressing one of the many social problems that many adolescent males undergo. I will be addressing and highlighting adolescence males living in Los Angeles, California who are peer pressured into bullying by their peers and conforming to peer pressure that leads to Cyber-bullying and Cyber-crimes.Read MorePersuasive Essay About Bullying859 Words   |  4 PagesBullying in schools is as old as any problem that plagues schools, and yet it is one of those cases that receive the least amount of attention. The air of denial is sometimes so pronounced that some schools brand themselves as â€Å"Bully Free† institutions. In the end, these downplayed incidents leave victims traumatized and scarred for many years while the culprits gain more confidence to continue with the evil deeds. Physical abuse, taunting, and exclusion of the victim from popular groups and pastimesRead MoreChildren With Same Sex Parents Essay1665 Words   |  7 Pagessex couples have good relationship with their parents at home. However, both parents and children have concerns about peer reaction in regards to potential being chosen to be bullied. Peer relations are one of the most important aspect of children development, as it is throughout these interactions that children and adolescent learns to function in a society. Studies show that peer rejection or lack of acceptance in childhood is linked to future low academic performance and drop out (Rubin, citedRead MoreBullying Is A Common And Serious Issue1218 Words   |  5 Pages What is teachers’ role in the school? Bullying is a common and serious issue in many schools these days and bullying is not only the United States’ but also in other countries’ problem. Basically, bullying prevents students from feeling safe in schools and also it prevents developing positive self-concepts. The longer bullying goes on, the more the students are affected. In handling bullying problems, teacher’s role is the most important to prevent bulling because teachers can directly interactRead More Bullying Essay example657 Words   |  3 Pagesbullied then you should know how bullying feels like. Bullying is very negative and creates major problems for our society. Nothing good comes out of bullying. It could very well change or ruin a person’s life. In fact, it does ruin many people’s lives. Kids can be mentally scarred if they are teased often. Even worse, they could be killed or fatally injured if the bullying gets extreme. There are many causes for bullying which must be taken care of before bullying can be stopped. T.V. violenceRead MoreBullying And Its Effects On Children1413 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction Bullying is considered to be aggressive behavior that is repeated or has the potential to be repeated, over a period of time. The actions of bullying can include spreading rumors, making threats, verbally or physically attacking someone, or purposely isolating someone from a group. As children attempt to make sense of traumatic events, new behavioral problems can stem from re-experienced occurrences. Some children affected may disassociate themselves from the situations and absorb themselvesRead MoreQuestions On Bullying And Bullying1518 Words   |  7 Pageshave no tolerance for bullying. Our anti-bullying policy gives teachers, students and anyone in the school community clear guidelines on how they should handle any allegations of bullying. This policy is intended to: †¢ Raise the awareness of the school community about the school’s stand on bullying. †¢ Provide strategies for preventing and dealing with bullying quickly and consistently. †¢ Provide understanding and support for bullied pupils. †¢ Help build an anti-bullying environment in the schoolRead MoreBystander Effect Essay1637 Words   |  7 PagesA bystander, according to Michael Webster’s New World College Dictionary, is an individual who is present in a given situation, but is not involved (Agnes, 2001). The word bystander does not always have a negative connotation, but in the case of bullying or an emergency situation, it does. In either scenario, a bystander is not helping in a time of crisis and this can have many negative outcomes. Many factors play a role in remaining passive and not engaging in prosocial behavior (Evans SmokowskiRead MoreBullying Is A Common Practice On School Grounds954 Words   |  4 Pages As a mother of two kids, bullying in schools is very important and personal subject to me. The problem is so extensive, lately it has been all over the media .According to research; bullying is when a person demonstrates an aggressive behavior and or constant toward another person. The se behaviors are intended to hurt and intimidate the person physically, mentally and emotionally (stopbullying.gov 2015). Although many schools have been struggling to prevent bullying, data shows that is it a common

Stop Book Banning Free Essays

Stop Book Banning! Should school administrators be allowed to ban books? Of course not! They are abusing their power of having the right to teach children. They want to ban a book just because it shows the true past of America, which some students cannot handle. They should not shield the past; if anything they should tell everything about the past and explain to the students why the events occurred. We will write a custom essay sample on Stop Book Banning or any similar topic only for you Order Now They should understand why America did the things it did so that they will not be ashamed of the country that they live in and they can then defend their country to anybody trying to put it down. One reason administrators should not be allowed to ban books is because it takes the right and freedom to choose what is read, away from the parents and students. Doesn’t it say in the first amendment that all people have the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press? By writing a book you are expressing and sharing your opinions which is exercising the freedom of speech, and by putting your words down on paper, you are exercising your freedom of the press. Why then are the school administrators trying to take our rights away from us? What makes them think they have the right to take away our freedoms given to us from the first amendment of the Constitution? The article â€Å"Book Banning Efforts are Up, Poll Finds† by Hillel Italie, says, ‘â€Å"It all stems from a fearfulness of well-meaning people,† said Michael Gorman, president of the library association. â€Å"We believe in parental responsibility, and that you should take care of what your children are reading. But it’s not your responsibility to tell a whole class of kids what they should read. ’ This is saying that yes you do have the right to decide what your kid reads, however you cannot decide what other kids should read. This also applies to the administrators. They can decide what their kid can read, but they cannot decide what an entire school can or cannot read. Another reason to not ban books is because it prevents kids from learning. How can we learn about the past and the way America was back when the great Ame rican authors wrote, when the administrators take away the books that teach us this, preventing us from learning? How can we learn of the language of the olden days when we cannot read this language? How are we supposed to learn the history of our ancestors and their ancestors when there is a possibility that administrators will ban the book that will help us do so? Why are the people of America letting these administrators get away with this cruel and unjust act? The article â€Å"Let Me Poison My Mind with Books† by Craig Pearson states, â€Å"Just like muscles, the brain requires pushups. The more ideas we expose ourselves to the more we devise our own. That’s why education, and thus reading, is so essential, even if by some people’s account what we read is dirty. † People should be able to choose for themselves what they read, and nobody else should be able to tell them differently. One person reads a book and learns something from that particular book. However, another person can read the exact same book and learn something completely different from what the first person learned. Why should this fact of life and learning be taken away because one person reads a book, learns something they don’t like from it, and then proceeds to take that book away from others, even though they will most likely learn something different then what the person trying to ban the book learned? The reason for the first person trying to ban the book could be something that another reader does not even notice or care about and it therefore does not impact them. So why are people so worried? One argument to my case could be that some people feel that these books should be banned to protect students from indecent and controversial material. But why should books be banned to protect one student in a school of hundreds, when none of the other kids or their parents feels that they need that kind of protection? You can not protect one kid from material if it means preventing others from that material. Instead, the kid who needs â€Å"protecting† should learn to protect themselves and choose not to read that material that could be harmful to him/her. Students need to learn to make decisions for themselves and banning material from a library is in no way helping them learn for themselves. If they are sheltered their whole life then what is going to happen when they embrace the real world? In the article â€Å"Did You Ever Meet a Book You Didn’t Like? † by Sharon Coatney, she says, â€Å"That being said, books are meant to be chosen carefully. Some titles are appropriate in one situation and not in another, for one child and not another. † I think she says it beautifully. Every kid needs to look at the book, asses it, and make sure it is something that they can and want to read. Each book that is made has a purpose. This could mean that that book is meant to be read by a certain kid at a certain point in their life so as to help guide that kid through life. All books have the chance to influence a kid’s life, so why would administrators want to prevent the book from somehow helping someone? Why can’t the administrators put themselves in our shoes? If the roles were reversed they would feel the same as we do. Why then do they have no compassion? Why can’t they do for us what we would do for them? The saying goes, â€Å"Treat others the way you want to be treated. † Young children can do it. Why can’t we? How to cite Stop Book Banning, Essay examples

Incompatibilism Essay Example For Students

Incompatibilism Essay Is man free? If everything is determined by antecedent conditions, how can we consider mans actions to be free? Is the belief that everything is determined incompatible with the concept of freedom? If all actions are determined, how can one be held morally responsible? The three possible positions, which may be taken in regard to these question, libertarianism, compatibilism (soft determinism), incompatibilism (hard determinism) lead to very different notions of moral responsibility. It is my belief that the incompatibilist argument as described by Van Inwagen defeats the compatibilists notion of freedom. Incompatibilism is the most convincing of the three theories proposed regarding the relationship between free will and determinism. Determinism is the idea that at any instant exactly one possible future exists. Determinism is a thesis about propositions, and by definition a proposition has a certain truth-value which we can express. The belief that I am walking has at its core the proposition that I am walking. In opposition to determinism, the indeterminist stases that not all events are the result of prior conditions, there is perhaps one tenth of one percent of our actions that can be truly spontaneous. This incompatibilist philosophers hold is enough to justify indeterminism. Libertarianism, in contrast, is the denial of the belief that all human actions are caused by an individuals character. It holds that a free act is not an uncaused act as determinism believes it to be, but rather an act caused by the self as distinct from the character of an individual. (Campbell) Free will is perhaps best defined as the possibility of being capable of doing more than one action. We say someone has free will if, when pr esented with two distinct paths, of which they can only choose one, they are equally capable of acting in either way. For example, a man is offered a drink and can drink the beverage, or alternatively can not drink the beverage, if we hold this to be true and the man is in situations similar to this on a regular basis we say he has free will. In contrast to determinism free will is a thesis about agents. I shall argue therefor that free will is incompatible with determinism. Incompatibilist philosophers hold that because the world is determined we are incapable of having free will. Van Inwagens argument for determinism is still the most convincing of arguments in the debate of free will. ? P, all facts about universe before people were present. ? Neither I nor anyone else had any choice about control over P. ? If P then necessarily Q so only one possible future is conceivable. ? Necessarily Q must have come about and no one had any control over Q. So incompatibilism holds that our voluntary actions are based on our character, thus we do not really have free will as our character is controlled by our past. Incompatibilist philosophers easily defeat the idea of indeterminism. If John could be described as a calm, thoughtful, and a peaceful man but one night goes out has a few beers and gets in a fight, we might initially say that the tendency to fight is not a trait of his. All determinists agree that we need to have deeper analysis of Johns personality. There is perhaps something in his persona that leads him to this seemingly uncharacteristic action. Put simply determinist thinkers including incompatibilists maintain that just because we have not discovered the cause of a particular event does not mean it has no cause. In fact if we look back through history our knowledge of determined events increases as scientific knowledge increases. Therefor we have disproved the idea of indeterminism, as we cannot say an event has no cause, only that we have not found the cause of that particular event. It is always conceivable that under further inquiry we will reveal that an event was actually caused. Invetment Essay? If an action is not determined by the state of the world then it has no explanation in terms of causal relationships. ? But some free actions do have explanations in terms of their history. ? Therefor incompatibilism is wrong. This argument assumes that if an action is not a purely chance or random event, if it is influenced by or has an explanation in terms of the agents reasons or motives for doing it, then it is determined. A.J. Ayer (1946) put this argument in the following form:Either it is an accident that I chose to act as I do or it is not. If it is an accident, then it is merely a matter of chance that I did not choose to do otherwise; and if it is merely a matter of chance that I did not choose otherwise, it is surely irrational to hold me morally responsible for choosing as I did. But if it is not an accident, then presumably there is some causal explanation of my choice: and in that case we are led back to determinism. If we look back on the bulleted argument above premises 1 and 3 are beyond doubt as the first is merely a definition of incompatibilism, while the third must be true when we examine our experiences. We regularly give explanations of our own actions, I am doing this paper because it counts for a grade and I hope for an A. It is the second premise in this argument that is faulty. Ayer incorrectly assumes that either an action is determined or it is a purely chance event. Van Inwagen in his response to compatibilist theory say that their definition of freedom is imply a poor analysis and should be rejected. Incompatibilism is the strongest position to hold on the deterministic and free will dilemma. It is the only complete argument that has a strong analytically formatted argument. Compatibilism has support in numbers but philosophers have never given a strong support for its belief. Free will can simply not be acceptable if we also say that the world is determined. Bibliography: